Workshop on revised Annex 16: Unplanned deviations and QP discretion
Mr. Richard Funnell
The Interactive Workshop on revised Annex 16 posed several questions and tracked participant responses to questions on revised Annex 16. When asked if they were aware of Section 5 on unplanned deviations, 31% of those polled answered “yes” while 69% answered “no.” “Do you have a broad awareness of the contents of the revised Annex 16 recently published for public consumption. ”Yes” answered 47% of responders and 54% answered “no.” When asked if they had a “broad picture” of the sections principles and content, only 30% answered “yes” with 70 % answering “no.” When asked who felt that revised Annex 16’s inclusion in Section 5 was “broadly positive,” 71% responded that it was and 29% felt that it was not. Two product quality scenarios were presented to workshop participants followed by the question “What would you do?” The workshop ended with these questions and a request for feedback”
Where is the revised Annex 16 better than the old one?
Where do you think it is not as good?
What is a positive aspect of Section 5 on unplanned deviations?
The inaugural Student & Young Professionals’ Hackathon at 2019 ISPE Annual Meeting & Expo brought together 36 students and Young Professionals from around the globe to compete in a team-oriented, collaborative, and educational challenge, to learn...
Costs of pharmaceuticals to the American consumer and healthcare systems are immense, so immense in fact that Senators are calling for new actions to address the high cost of prescription drugs in America. The US spent 345 billion USD on prescription...