Features
March / April 2019

The Philippines: Biosimilars—Opportunities & Challenges

Richard Simon Regalado Binos
Generic Drugs Banner

It is the duty of the government to improve access to safe, effective, and quality medicines for its constituents. Various approaches are taken by different countries to achieve this; for the Philippines, the approach is through the active promotion of generics. Under Philippine laws, it is a policy of the state to promote “effective competition policy in the supply and demand of quality affordable medicines” through the use of generics medicines.12  By making generics available, the supply of medicines is ensured, and the medicines will be more affordable with greater competition.

“Generics” or “multisource pharmaceutical products” are off-patent versions of small-molecule therapies that demonstrate therapeutic equivalence to innovator products.34 This definition, however, does not cover large, complex molecules such as biologics. Similar biotherapeutic products (SBPs), or biosimilars, are similar in terms of quality, safety, and efficacy to an already licensed reference biotherapeutic product (RBP).

While both generics and biosimilars are approved on abbreviated pathways,5 they are not equivalent. Active ingredients of generic medicines are structurally the same; biosimilars, however, are structurally different and are produced through sophisticated biotechnology processes such as recombinant DNA.6  The methods of establishing “equivalence” for generics and “similarity” for biosimilars also differ. Therapeutic equivalence is demonstrated through bioequivalence using in vitro or in vivo studies, whichever is applicable. Similarity is established through comparability exercises on various parameters to determine the absence of relevant differences, as complemented by appropriate nonclinical and clinical data.7

While opportunities have opened, better availability has yet to be realized.

The Philippines: Biosimilars—Opportunities & Challenges banner

Legislation for Quality

The objective of the 1988 Philippine generics legislation is clear: to improve access by making available high-quality treatment options that are safe, effective, and affordable. Pursuant to this, the Philippine Food and Drug Administration (FDA) implemented Administrative Order No. 2014-0016,8 which provided regulatory guidance for the registration of biosimilars.

By adopting internationally accepted guidelines, marketing authorization holders are able to submit more or less the same evidence that they used to register their biosimilar products in “pioneer” regulatory authorities such as the EMA and the US FDA.

While opportunities have opened, better availability has yet to be realized. As of June 2017, three years after instituting the regulatory pathway, only three biosimilar products had been registered. A number of industry challenges can be discerned from the policy and its implementation.

Classification of Existing Biological Products

The Philippine FDA requires that when it receives a marketing authorization renewal for an existing biological product, evidence of similarity with an RBP must also be submitted unless the biological product is already classified as such. This is challenging for the industry since not all currently registered biological products were classified as either RBP or SBP during their development and initial registration. Thus, they may not have the necessary evidence to support their classification.

Scope of Regulation

The scope of the policy states that the biosimilar concept applies to “all biological drug applications except for vaccines, plasma-derived products, and their recombinant analogues.” Reconciling this with the definition of biological products means that comparability studies must be submitted for modified animal tissues, high-molecular-weight hormones, and the products of genetic engineering or other new biotechnological techniques. This runs counter to other regulatory best practices, as not all products may be classified as a biosimilar, especially biological products that are difficult to characterize.

Administrative Challenges

Currently, the length of the Philippine FDA regulatory reviews ranges from two to four years, which is heavily attributed to the limited manpower complement. While there is industry interest in submitting applications that follow internationally aligned requirements (and a number of companies have already done so), long queueing time affects the availability of these products in the market.

Conditional Approvals and Post-marketing Commitments

To sustain interest, the Philippine FDA may consider conditional approvals for new biosimilars with limited evidence. This is common in the EU, provided that post-marketing commitments are met. This is an incentive for investing in research and development not only for biosimilars but also for other innovative medicines.

Not a Member Yet?

To continue reading this article and to take advantage of full access to Pharmaceutical Engineering magazine articles, technical reports, white papers and exclusive content on the latest pharmaceutical engineering news, join ISPE today. In addition to exclusive access to all of the content in Pharmaceutical Engineering magazine, you will get online access to 24 ISPE Good Practice Guides, exclusive networking events, regulatory resources, Communities of Practice, and more.

Learn more about the valuable benefits you'll receive with an ISPE membership.

Join Today