AI as an Enabler for a Sustainable Quality Transformation

 Listen to Audio

 

Listen Anywhere

June 2025

This episode, Takeda’s Senior Vice President, Head of Global Quality Compliance & Systems, Magaly Aham, joins the podcast to discuss how AI can enable sustainable quality transformation.

  • Guest

    SVP Head of Global Quality Compliance & Systems
    Takeda - Boston
  • Transcript

    Back to Top

    Download Transcript


    1
    00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:04,000
    Welcome to the ISPE podcast, Shaping the Future of Pharma,

    2
    00:00:04,000 --> 00:00:09,000
    where ISPE supports you on your journey, fueling innovation, sharing insights,

    3
    00:00:09,000 --> 00:00:14,000
    thought leadership, and empowering a global community to reimagine what's possible.

    4
    00:00:15,000 --> 00:00:23,000 

    Hello and welcome to the ISPE podcast, Shaping the Future of Pharma. I'm Bob Chew, your host,

    5
    00:00:23,000 --> 00:00:27,000
    and today we have another episode where we'll be sharing the latest insights and thought

    6
    00:00:27,000 --> 00:00:34,000
    leadership on manufacturing, technology, supply chains, and regulatory trends impacting the

    7
    00:00:34,000 --> 00:00:40,000
    pharmaceutical industry. You will hear directly from the innovators, experts, and professionals

    8
    00:00:40,000 --> 00:00:46,000
    driving progress and shaping the future. Thank you again for joining us, and now let's dive

    9
    00:00:46,000 --> 00:00:54,000
    into this episode. Our topic today is AI as an enabler for a sustainable quality transformation.

    10
    00:00:55,000 --> 00:01:01,000
    To share more about this topic, I would like to welcome Magaly Aham, Senior Vice President and

    11
    00:01:01,000 --> 00:01:08,000
    Head of Global Quality Compliance and Systems at Takeda, who recently keynoted at the 2025

    12
    00:01:08,000 --> 00:01:15,000
    ISPE Biotechnology Conference in Boston. Magaly, welcome to the podcast. We're glad to have you

    13
    00:01:15,000 --> 00:01:24,000
    with us. Thank you so much, Bob, for having me. So, Takeda, like most pharmaceutical companies,

    14
    00:01:24,000 --> 00:01:30,000
    has initiatives to explore applications of AI and related technologies. Can you tell us

    15
    00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:38,000
    about what your company is working on regarding AI as an enabler for sustainable quality transformation?

    16
    00:01:38,000 --> 00:01:46,000
    Sure. We have some good stories going on right now. For example, we have a deviation AI assistant,

    17
    00:01:47,000 --> 00:01:55,000
    which facilitates drafting of investigation reports based on input entered by the investigator.

    18
    00:01:56,000 --> 00:02:03,000
    It has a series of questions per investigation element, such as problem statement, initial

    19
    00:02:04,000 --> 00:02:11,000
    impact assessment, scope, et cetera. The investigator then responds to each question,

    20
    00:02:11,000 --> 00:02:17,000
    and then at the end, the AI assistant generates a structured narrative,

    21
    00:02:18,000 --> 00:02:28,000
    saving, of course, time from repetitive manual drafting, increasing readability, and quality

    22
    00:02:28,000 --> 00:02:35,000
    of the final report. It also has multilingual capabilities, which is actually pretty cool.

    23
    00:02:36,000 --> 00:02:45,000
    And right now, we have it in four languages, including English, German, French, and Japanese.

    24
    00:02:46,000 --> 00:02:52,000
    We're also working on SOP transformation. It's another one of the tools that we have

    25
    00:02:52,000 --> 00:03:02,000
    ongoing right now. And what we have at this moment covers three functions, search, compare,

    26
    00:03:02,000 --> 00:03:09,000
    and summarize. And the search function, for example, helps you input a specific process

    27
    00:03:09,000 --> 00:03:17,000
    you want to know about, for example, process validation. Then it gives you key details on

    28
    00:03:17,000 --> 00:03:26,000
    the topic, and also gives you a link to the most relevant SOP from our document management system.

    29
    00:03:28,000 --> 00:03:37,000
    The compare function allows you to input any SOP, and will pull from the document management systems

    30
    00:03:37,000 --> 00:03:45,000
    SOPs that are similar, and how similar they are by means of a percentage. So not only pulls

    31
    00:03:45,000 --> 00:03:53,000
    a list of SOPs, it actually tells you how similar they are or not, and it explains that.

    32
    00:03:53,000 --> 00:04:02,000
    It explains the similarity and the key differences. So it's very helpful. It does the search for you,

    33
    00:04:02,000 --> 00:04:11,000
    and it can also help you eliminate redundant SOPs, or when you are trying to work on

    34
    00:04:12,000 --> 00:04:19,000
    optimization or standardization, it's very useful in helping you identify all of those

    35
    00:04:19,000 --> 00:04:28,000
    related SOPs that may be in scope of your work. The last function is summarize, and this one

    36
    00:04:28,000 --> 00:04:37,000
    allows you to input any SOP, and it will provide you a summary of key information from that SOP.

    37
    00:04:38,000 --> 00:04:44,000
    So this is very useful when you want to understand certain SOPs, but you don't necessarily need to

    38
    00:04:44,000 --> 00:04:52,000
    train on them, so it's an easy way to get overall content. As part of this SOP transformation,

    39
    00:04:52,000 --> 00:05:03,000
    we're also exploring other functionalities, including the SOP drafting, and even using this

    40
    00:05:03,000 --> 00:05:12,000
    tool to assess if we can evaluate training development content. So more to come on that one.

    41
    00:05:12,000 --> 00:05:19,000
    Okay, so a few things come to mind. Change management, for example. So you have a change

    42
    00:05:19,000 --> 00:05:28,000
    proposal, and maybe you know that it's going to impact this SOP, or maybe that's part of the

    43
    00:05:28,000 --> 00:05:35,000
    change is to you want to alter this SOP. Do you think this system could then kind of

    44
    00:05:35,000 --> 00:05:42,000
    go out and say, well, okay, if you're going to change this, it's impacting this and this and this?

    45
    00:05:44,000 --> 00:05:51,000
    Well, right now, that's currently embedded in the document management system that we have, because

    46
    00:05:52,000 --> 00:06:00,000
    we have linkages, right, to related SOPs. So when you are, to your point, perhaps

    47
    00:06:01,000 --> 00:06:08,000
    working on a change control and you pull, I don't know, the process validation SOP,

    48
    00:06:09,000 --> 00:06:16,000
    that process validation SOP in its metadata, we have linkages to other SOPs. So when you

    49
    00:06:16,000 --> 00:06:25,000
    include that one as an impacted SOP, you will have the information on other related SOPs

    50
    00:06:25,000 --> 00:06:33,000
    for change management purposes. Okay. Onboarding of new people. And, you know,

    51
    00:06:33,000 --> 00:06:41,000
    you're given this list of SOPs that you need to read and understand, right? Is there any way that

    52
    00:06:42,000 --> 00:06:51,000
    some of these tools could help streamline that, maybe reduce the time required for onboarding

    53
    00:06:51,000 --> 00:07:01,000
    new people? Absolutely. It's one of the areas that we're exploring, how we can link the SOP

    54
    00:07:01,000 --> 00:07:09,000
    transformation with training and really not training, but learning, you know, having a more

    55
    00:07:09,000 --> 00:07:16,000
    focused activities in the actual learning piece rather than just reading an SOP.

    56
    00:07:17,000 --> 00:07:22,000
    We're not there yet, but absolutely it's one of the areas that we're exploring.

    57
    00:07:22,000 --> 00:07:30,000
    Okay. Well, great. So I'm sure you've heard of other companies and I'm sure you've been

    58
    00:07:30,000 --> 00:07:39,000
    approached by vendors with different AI apps. What stands out about your approach? How is it

    59
    00:07:39,000 --> 00:07:43,000
    unique or different from what others may be working on and why?

    60
    00:07:47,000 --> 00:07:54,000
    I don't know what may stand out as I don't have that insight as to how other companies are working

    61
    00:07:54,000 --> 00:08:01,000
    on their digital strategy. What I do know is that it's a focus everywhere because there's value,

    62
    00:08:01,000 --> 00:08:10,000
    right? I can talk about Takeda and Takeda has been very intentional. One of our objectives,

    63
    00:08:10,000 --> 00:08:20,000
    obviously, is to become a digital biopharmaceutical company. So we have been

    64
    00:08:20,000 --> 00:08:27,000
    very intentional in creating an engine that will drive this digital transformation that we're

    65
    00:08:27,000 --> 00:08:38,000
    striving to achieve, including a lot of obviously training. We have many different

    66
    00:08:39,000 --> 00:08:49,000
    courses and certifications that allows many of our employees to gain understanding up to the level

    67
    00:08:49,000 --> 00:08:56,000
    that they want to get, right? There's some training that allows some of our employees to

    68
    00:08:57,000 --> 00:09:06,000
    even develop their own AI companion tools. We also have innovation centers,

    69
    00:09:06,000 --> 00:09:14,000
    internal innovation centers, which I think is an advantage for us because we have these

    70
    00:09:14,000 --> 00:09:23,000
    innovation centers across Takeda, which what they do is basically we go to these centers and

    71
    00:09:23,000 --> 00:09:31,000
    present our ideas for solutions or things that we envision. And we have the technical

    72
    00:09:32,000 --> 00:09:39,000
    powerhouse there to allow us to develop those solutions and evaluate whether they're scalable

    73
    00:09:39,000 --> 00:09:48,000
    across the organization or not. So I think that's a very useful thing for us to have and allows us

    74
    00:09:48,000 --> 00:09:58,000
    to drive innovation faster. The other thing that comes to mind with this question is we also have

    75
    00:09:58,000 --> 00:10:07,000
    an AI labs, okay, where people can test their AI ideas for feasibility in a safe environment

    76
    00:10:08,000 --> 00:10:15,000
    and without impacting any of our systems. So this allows people to feel not only more comfortable

    77
    00:10:15,000 --> 00:10:25,000
    with AI and the possibilities, but also excited on what it can do in facilitating our daily work.

    78
    00:10:26,000 --> 00:10:30,000
    So let me go back to this innovation center where you take your ideas.

    79
    00:10:31,000 --> 00:10:40,000
    There's always a tension or a conflict as companies try to innovate between letting people

    80
    00:10:40,000 --> 00:10:49,000
    sort of play and experiment and try different things versus, okay, here's the vision and we're

    81
    00:10:49,000 --> 00:10:55,000
    creating this and then this and then this and then this and anything else doesn't fit in.

    82
    00:10:56,000 --> 00:11:02,000
    How do you balance allowing for creativity and experimentation versus

    83
    00:11:03,000 --> 00:11:10,000
    descending into chaos and the resulting need to systematize everything?

    84
    00:11:11,000 --> 00:11:19,000
    No, that's a very good question because especially if you provide for the environment, right, and when

    85
    00:11:19,000 --> 00:11:25,000
    we talk about the AI labs for people to experiment, I think that also helps people

    86
    00:11:25,000 --> 00:11:35,000
    feel more comfortable and it helps us demystify AI and gen AI in a way. So it actually helps us

    87
    00:11:35,000 --> 00:11:41,000
    augment capabilities and help people feel more comfortable. But to your point, yes, we do have

    88
    00:11:41,000 --> 00:11:50,000
    governance, right? So we might have solutions that could be developed. However, not every solution

    89
    00:11:51,000 --> 00:11:59,000
    is approved for wider implementation. First of all, we need to understand the problem that we are

    90
    00:12:00,000 --> 00:12:09,000
    solving. We are also evaluating for scalability, right? Is this a solution that is scalable

    91
    00:12:09,000 --> 00:12:18,000
    across the entire Takeda organization? And what's the level of effort? Also, what's the

    92
    00:12:18,000 --> 00:12:28,000
    value creation? Because everything takes time and time represents also cost. So what is the value

    93
    00:12:28,000 --> 00:12:40,000
    creation? How is these tools or digital tools that are being created contribute to our vision

    94
    00:12:40,000 --> 00:12:49,000
    of value creation of being better, faster, and more efficient? So we have governance in place

    95
    00:12:49,000 --> 00:12:57,000
    to determine that. I assume then from what you said that there are companion teams in,

    96
    00:12:57,000 --> 00:13:04,000
    for example, MS&T or other groups who are also working with AI, machine learning,

    97
    00:13:04,000 --> 00:13:16,000
    or digital twin technologies. Is that true? Absolutely, yes. We have an enterprise DD&T

    98
    00:13:16,000 --> 00:13:28,000
    organization that establishes the framework for the enterprise and the strategy that will

    99
    00:13:28,000 --> 00:13:34,000
    enable Takeda to identify and address the unmet needs across the different business units that we

    100
    00:13:34,000 --> 00:13:43,000
    have through share investments. They steward the DD&T span across Takeda and drive enterprise

    101
    00:13:43,000 --> 00:13:51,000
    innovation. As part of that enterprise DD&T organization, we have business partners who sit

    102
    00:13:51,000 --> 00:14:01,000
    on the DD&T leadership team, and they represent many T&T organizations across Takeda. And T&T

    103
    00:14:01,000 --> 00:14:08,000
    is an acronym for Takeda Executive Team. And what I mean by that to your question is these

    104
    00:14:09,000 --> 00:14:19,000
    organizations are like global manufacturing and supply and quality, R&D, Japan, PDT or plasma

    105
    00:14:19,000 --> 00:14:27,000
    derived therapies, among others. So we have the enterprise DD&T or data, digital, and technology

    106
    00:14:27,000 --> 00:14:35,000
    organization. And then we have DD&T heads in all of these sister organizations or business units

    107
    00:14:35,000 --> 00:14:45,000
    across the organization. The structure makes us more agile to drive value for our users and

    108
    00:14:45,000 --> 00:14:53,000
    customers. And based on the aspiration I mentioned earlier of becoming a digital biopharmaceutical

    109
    00:14:53,000 --> 00:15:04,000
    company, yes, we are working with AI, AI, virtual reality, augmented reality in all parts of the

    110
    00:15:04,000 --> 00:15:12,000
    organization. And yes, we are also piloting and using digital twins, not only in manufacturing,

    111
    00:15:12,000 --> 00:15:20,000
    but even in R&D. So that's just some of the examples that come to mind.

    112
    00:15:20,000 --> 00:15:28,000
    So at the Facilities of the Future conference last January, ISPE's conference in San Francisco,

    113
    00:15:28,000 --> 00:15:36,000
    I heard Sanofi make a presentation about a digital twin aseptic filling machine.

    114
    00:15:37,000 --> 00:15:44,000
    But it took them four years, and the first three was pretty much just getting the site organization

    115
    00:15:45,000 --> 00:15:53,000
    to buy in to doing this at all. So what issues or stumbling blocks have you encountered,

    116
    00:15:53,000 --> 00:16:03,000
    and how did you solve them? Well, from the manufacturing perspective, if we talk about

    117
    00:16:03,000 --> 00:16:11,000
    digital twins, we're piloting that, like I said, in R&D, in manufacturing.

    118
    00:16:12,000 --> 00:16:21,000
    From the quality perspective, one of the stumbling areas that I can share

    119
    00:16:22,000 --> 00:16:34,000
    has to do with the data quality, right? And perhaps the inconsistency that we have found

    120
    00:16:34,000 --> 00:16:43,000
    in data structure, and particularly when you are dealing with different data sources.

    121
    00:16:44,000 --> 00:16:50,000
    So having data that is not standardized or from different systems has been a challenge,

    122
    00:16:50,000 --> 00:16:58,000
    at least for the digital tools that we are working on in quality. To that extent,

    123
    00:16:59,000 --> 00:17:08,000
    Takeda has put in place a data governance organization that is working on different

    124
    00:17:08,000 --> 00:17:17,000
    aspects of data, because obviously that's the raw material, right, for all of these initiatives.

    125
    00:17:17,000 --> 00:17:23,000
    So master data, data quality to ensure that the requirements for new systems are in place,

    126
    00:17:24,000 --> 00:17:30,000
    and for tools that are being developed that need to leverage whatever systems we have right now,

    127
    00:17:30,000 --> 00:17:38,000
    that we have better guidance in terms of what we will need in order to make those initiatives or

    128
    00:17:38,000 --> 00:17:47,000
    tools successful in achieving what we want to achieve. And in some cases, that might be

    129
    00:17:47,000 --> 00:17:54,000
    data cleanup and standardization. So yeah, I understand what you mean about taking

    130
    00:17:56,000 --> 00:18:02,000
    some of these years. We have had some situations where we have tried some tools

    131
    00:18:04,000 --> 00:18:12,000
    sometimes, and we have to recall that AI, gen AI, we have kind of learned as we go.

    132
    00:18:12,000 --> 00:18:23,000
    And so in many cases, we have designed some solutions with the output and not the input

    133
    00:18:23,000 --> 00:18:32,000
    in mind. And that has represented some challenges. So the apps that you have developed and deployed,

    134
    00:18:33,000 --> 00:18:36,000
    can you quantify the benefits that you've achieved?

    135
    00:18:36,000 --> 00:18:45,000
    Well, value creation is part of what we consider in every project. But I can tell you that

    136
    00:18:46,000 --> 00:18:53,000
    so far, overall, in Takeda, it will be millions of dollars. We also have been working with

    137
    00:18:55,000 --> 00:19:00,000
    automated visual inspection system using AI, and that has helped us reduce

    138
    00:19:01,000 --> 00:19:15,000
    rejection rates from around 30% for parental biologics to less than two, and has allowed us

    139
    00:19:15,000 --> 00:19:22,000
    to save at least 16 hours per batch in the places where we have incorporated this, just to name a

    140
    00:19:22,000 --> 00:19:30,000
    few examples. Well, that's impressive. And it's great that you've been able to implement that

    141 
    00:19:30,000 --> 00:19:38,000
    kind of technology. Thank you. Going forward, what innovations do you see possible with AI

    142
    00:19:38,000 --> 00:19:44,000
    and related technologies? And what organizational regulatory and resource challenges might exist?

    143
    00:19:45,000 --> 00:19:50,000
    And how broadly and in what ways do you see these technologies being used in five years?

    144
    00:19:51,000 --> 00:19:58,000
    Oh, wow. I see this applied everywhere, everywhere that is possible, right? I think

    145
    00:19:59,000 --> 00:20:10,000
    as an industry, as I mentioned earlier, I think we all see the value of applying these technologies

    146
    00:20:11,000 --> 00:20:23,000
    internally. For once, it allows us to be more predictive. And I think it changes the mindset of

    147
    00:20:24,000 --> 00:20:33,000
    going from firefighting to more risk awareness and being more predictive on everything that you do.

    148
    00:20:33,000 --> 00:20:42,000
    There's definitely a need to augment understanding, because you don't really validate AI,

    149
    00:20:42,000 --> 00:20:50,000
    right? It learns. So, it's something that is still kind of an area that we all need,

    150
    00:20:50,000 --> 00:21:00,000
    particularly regulators, get into understanding these models a little bit more, because it does

    151
    00:21:00,000 --> 00:21:09,000
    require a shift in mindset. Of course, we will have to work with regulatory guardrails to monitor

    152
    00:21:09,000 --> 00:21:18,000
    its application. But I see it's used everywhere. R&D, for instance, conducting in silico studies,

    153
    00:21:20,000 --> 00:21:27,000
    and perhaps even digital runs to demonstrate process optimization outcomes. And this could

    154
    00:21:27,000 --> 00:21:33,000
    perhaps minimize the amount of PPQ batches that you might need to run in the future for

    155
    00:21:34,000 --> 00:21:39,000
    submissions and new product launches. So, I think the possibilities are endless.

    156
    00:21:40,000 --> 00:21:48,000
    Well, thank you for sharing these initiatives and the success stories. Just to recap,

    157
    00:21:49,000 --> 00:21:57,000
    Takeda has a center of excellence where it sort of brings together these different initiatives.

    158
    00:21:58,000 --> 00:22:07,000
    Your quality department has created this AI for structuring deviation, adjudication, and

    159
    00:22:07,000 --> 00:22:13,000
    development in the reports. You've got something that looks at SOPs, and you're exploring ways

    160
    00:22:13,000 --> 00:22:21,000
    this can help with training. That's all really great. I think it's wonderful that these

    161
    00:22:21,000 --> 00:22:26,000
    technologies are really getting some airtime. So, this brings us to the end of another episode of

    162
    00:22:26,000 --> 00:22:34,000
    the ISPE podcast, Shaping the Future of Pharma. A big thank you to our guest, Magaly Aham, for

    163
    00:22:34,000 --> 00:22:40,000
    sharing more about how global quality Takeda is using AI to enable sustainable quality transformation.

    164
    00:22:41,000 --> 00:22:46,000
    Please be sure to subscribe so you don't miss future conversations with the innovators,

    165
    00:22:46,000 --> 00:22:52,000
    experts, and changemakers driving our industry forward. On behalf of all of us at ISPE,

    166
    00:22:52,000 --> 00:22:57,000
    thank you for listening, and we'll see you next time as we continue to explore the ideas,

    167
    00:22:57,000 --> 00:23:04,000
    trends, and people shaping the future of pharma.

Listen to Past Episodes

Audio file

In this episode, Susan Szathmary and Richard Jaenisch, both of Open BioPharma Research and Training Institute, join the podcast to share how to accelerate the adoption of new technologies through applied AI in pharma manufacturing and for workforce

Audio file

This episode includes highlights from our Future of ATMPs series, featuring speakers from last year's ISPE Europe Annual Conference discussing industrialization of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products production by replacing manual, high-cost